Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

Social Media and Campaigns

  Throughout American history, incumbents have long had the upper hand during elections. Newcomers are often fenced off from the political field due to a lack of financing, difficulty getting recognition, etc. It has been nearly impossible for a new politician to compete with someone with all the connections, money, and influence, but social media has changed the game. Now, candidates have a more even playing field, as they can directly address constituents and use platforms shared with millions of users.  During the 2020 election campaign, Michael Bloomberg spent over one billion dollars on his run for President, and he still failed horribly. The average winning incumbent Senator in the 2020 election raised a median of $13.2 million dollars. From these numbers alone, it's apparent how expensive the political game is, and why it has been so difficult for newcomers to be a real threat to incumbents. In 2008, Barack Obama used platforms like Twitter to reach out to the electorate dir

Latest Posts

Elon Musk Rules Twitter - Trump's Second Chance

Social Media and Political Advertising

Gender Equality and Media

How Tech Platforms Fueled the January 6th Insurrection and Political Polarization

Digital Discrimination: Social Media Redlining

How People are Fighting the Ukraine-Russia Conflict Through Social Media

Trump's Twitter Rip-Off

How the "Metaverse" Could Change Real-Life Politics

"Dear White Staffers" - D.C.'s Gossip Girl

Information Overload is Fueling Fake News on Social Media Platforms